Galley stove/ovens

  • 22 Apr 2018 07:20
    Reply # 6114115 on 6113905
    Arne Kverneland wrote:  

    Then I got the idea to streamline the combustion chamber by fitting a cone instead of the washer. The first one was 30mm diameter and the next 40mm. This last one appeared to boost the burner quite a bit, and cooking time appeared to be faster than before. The flame picked up fast after a cold start and the ‘flame flow’ appeared faster than ever before.


    Good, Arne. This was the idea that I suggested here, and I'm glad that you've tried it out. As I said back then, "What I've done may not be the only thing that will [improve the burn], but it seems to work". This cone may be one of the better ones, though a little more work than the penny washer.



  • 22 Apr 2018 03:17
    Reply # 6114023 on 1195343
    Anonymous member (Administrator)

    Hello! Thanks so much for getting back to me and for your comments and further testing, I really appreciate it. Sorry for taking time to respond. I am not on the forums often enough! 

    What materials did we use? 

    Alcohol from NZ no colour, we add a bit of water (10%?)  to burn cleaner (which works). Once I finished the current container I will try neat alcohol with the modified burners. 

    Fittings - stainless steel bolt with the penny washer as per David Tyler's instructions. 

    Pete did think that lifting the washer up a bit might help, yet to try it. 

    Watery eyes? 

    Bad, at the point of crying, while the burner is heating up. Not affecting me so much once it gets going. We noticed a strong smell at the beginning which we never noticed before. 

    Conclusion -  probably go back to standard flame spreader (which we ordered from the UK - SEAMARK NUNN on eBay). After 6 years the flame spreaders are giving up the ghost! 

    Awaiting further development - although once offline for a while I am not sure how I will catch up on it. 

    Thanks so much for helping with this. 

    Cheers - Linda & Pete 

  • 21 Apr 2018 22:26
    Reply # 6113905 on 1195343
    Anonymous member (Administrator)
         

    Inspired by David’s photos and findings below, I had another go yesterday and today:
    A while ago I bought a new  Dometic Origo 1500 (single burner) to see if I could make a good heater of it. I used that one for my trials.

    First I copied David’s setup, with a washer. It made a nice blue flame, but it took a while to ‘gain momentum’. It was not faster than without the washer, rather a bit slower, I think. It could have to do with me using too big washer (a 20 Norw. kroner coin, 27mm wide).

    Then I got the idea to streamline the combustion chamber by fitting a cone instead of the washer. The first one was 30mm diameter and the next 40mm. This last one appeared to boost the burner quite a bit, and cooking time appeared to be faster than before. The flame picked up fast after a cold start and the ‘flame flow’ appeared faster than ever before.

    To help me shape that cut-off cone, I actually used the maths in my mast collar write-up, and the results were plotted into my QCAD program to quickly let me print out a pattern. With the burner on full speed, there was still some yellow left in the (15cm tall) flame, but with the kettle on, the flame was still all blue.

    There is one noise-factor here. I am using a different, yellow fuel with only 80% ethanol in it. It was said to burn cleaner. Still, before fitting washers or cones, there was plenty of yellow in the flame. I will try the burner with ordinary red, 96% fuel, when I have used up the yellow fuel.

    Arne

    Photos re-installed 20230702




    Last modified: 02 Jul 2023 13:38 | Anonymous member (Administrator)
  • 21 Apr 2018 17:31
    Reply # 6113696 on 1195343

    I also did some experimenting to see if I could make the Origo burn better.  One of the observations I had was that anything you put in the flame path absorbs heat initially and depending on what I put in the path, some things seemed to continuously conduct heat away as well.  I suspect your observations can be explained by the increase of mass in the flame path causes incomplete combustion, at least while the stove is warming up.  So the stove takes longer to get going and during that period you have incomplete combustion.  Pure ethanol shouldn't cause eye irritation in this case, but there are lots of additives that do.  I've found the non-dyed ethanol fuel available for in-home non-vented fireplaces to be much better in this regard than some others.  Although, denaturing methods and laws are different the world over, so experimentation is likely required.

    These stoves rely on a particularly delicate balance of forces.  As David described there is not a lot of draft and mixing in air can be a problem.  However, at the same time the heat reflected back to the canister controls the rate at which alcohol vapor is released and the temperature in the cylinder above the canister also effects how complete combustion is.  Unfortunately, changing one of these factors can have a knock-on effect on the others.  A hard nut to crack indeed.

  • 20 Apr 2018 16:46
    Reply # 6112593 on 1195343

    http://www.junkrigassociation.org/yachtclubbar/487928#5654047

    I think the eye watering is to do with the formulation of the fuel. I've heard of this when methanol is used (methyl hydrate is more common in Canada than denatured ethanol), but I haven't experienced it. It may also be because of imperfect combustion when the burner is warming up.

    2 files
    Last modified: 20 Apr 2018 16:47 | Anonymous member
  • 20 Apr 2018 15:26
    Reply # 6112515 on 1195343
    Deleted user

    The extra condensation makes sense to me:  there's more H2O around due to the more complete combustion.  

    The eye watering - not as clear, but a perfect phenomenon for rampant speculation.  A couple questions:

    I don't have Facebook - what were the modifications and what materials did Pete use to make them?  

    Do your eyes remain irritated as long as the burner is going, or only for the first few minutes after it's lit?


    Last modified: 20 Apr 2018 18:37 | Deleted user
  • 20 Apr 2018 07:14
    Reply # 6112087 on 1195343

    Hi

    I badgered (!) Pete to make the modifications to the Oryx's Origo 3000 stove as per David Tyler's suggestion I found on FaceBook and somewhere in this thread (sorry can't find it now).  Having done so here are my findings:

    Advantages

    • It seems to burn better and stronger. The flame is blue instead of yellow. 

    Disadvantages

    • It seems to need to warm up before getting the full flame, which it never did before.
    • The fumes produced are watering my eyes, not Pete's
    • At the bottom of the kettle there is a lot of condensation when first put on the flame, which was never there before
    • None of this did I notice before - having used the stove for the past 18 months. 

    Can anyone explain why my eyes are affected by this modification? 

    PS: Beware doing the modification on older cookers as the Flame Spreaders become fragile and may break when removing them,  speaking from experience!


  • 19 Jan 2018 05:59
    Reply # 5690781 on 5688383
    David Porter wrote:

    Just discovered this interesting thread. My two cents - I bought an Origo two burner forr a yacht I had in HK and was very happy with it for the three years or so before I sold the boat on leaving the country. Well made, and it cooked fast enough for my admittedly modest requirements.The only issue was that the flame was sometimes a bit hard to see in daylight but you got used to it. I would certainly buy another one, though I think they are pricey for what they are.

    David

    Hi David

    This topic seems to have become subsumed in this thread.  (I would really love for someone to volunteer to go through all the various fora and reorganise them.  For example, there are a lot of topics on the General Forum, that really ought to be on the Technical Forum.)

    It's good to hear your positive comments.  If you look at the thread I've just linked to, you will see that David Tyler reckons he has improved the Origo - although I think, if anything, the flame will be less visible.  This can be a problem with an alcohol cooker.  Holding a hand over the burner usually clarifies the issue!

    Pricey for what they are?  Probably.  On the other hand, I don't suppose that the demand for them compares with gas cookers and the carriage and import duties were no doubt a significant part of the cost.


  • 17 Jan 2018 22:07
    Reply # 5688383 on 1195343
    Deleted user

    Just discovered this interesting thread. My two cents - I bought an Origo two burner forr a yacht I had in HK and was very happy with it for the three years or so before I sold the boat on leaving the country. Well made, and it cooked fast enough for my admittedly modest requirements.The only issue was that the flame was sometimes a bit hard to see in daylight but you got used to it. I would certainly buy another one, though I think they are pricey for what they are.

    David

  • 03 Oct 2017 16:38
    Reply # 5292797 on 5291435
    Deleted user
    Annie Hill wrote:
    Neil Tanner wrote:

    I don't know if this link has been mentioned or if will be of any use.  It's been helpful for me since I use kerosene for cooking and heating on Sea Elf.  https://classiccampstoves.com/


    Yup, I discovered it some time ago when investigating pressure alcohol stoves.  All sorts of interesting stuff.  It's amazing how many people appear to collect them rather than simply to use them!!
    The folks in the group were really helpful when I had issues with my heater.  In fact one of the fellows in the UK sent me misc. stuff no charge to get the heater running properly again. 

    I guess if it exists, someone's gonna collect it, some just like to look at the stuff on their shelves...others like to use 'em.  Actually, there is a section in CCS where the guys will show meals they're cooking with the their refurbished stoves......my mouth drools looking at some of the meals!


       " ...there is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing about in junk-rigged boats" 
                                                               - the Chinese Water Rat

                                                              Site contents © the Junk Rig Association and/or individual authors

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software