.

Comparison testing of split junk by Karl Fuller video

<< First  < Prev   1   2   3   4   5   ...   Next >  Last >> 
  • 29 Jul 2026 16:42
    Reply # 13658866 on 13653957

    But really, we don't need a computer. There aren't many measurements to be made. All we need is something like a fishing scale (or two) and a piece of paper/spreadsheet.

    It's more important to decide what the sails we want to measure should look like.

    Last modified: 29 Jul 2026 20:15 | Anonymous member
  • 28 Jul 2026 15:40
    Reply # 13658267 on 13653957

    Aha! I get it! So we can't escape splashing around in a bathtub or a water tank after all.

    I think we could use a vessel similar to the one you showed in the photo, with one difference: the fans (the "wind wall") would be outside the tank and could be positioned at various angles to the sail. The sail itself would be inside, on a floating platform connected to the scales via "mythical" springs (strain gauges?). Much like how Marchaj did it.

    The hardware part is a bit of a mystery to me, but it doesn't seem impossible. Maybe we can find someone who knows how to figure out those specifics. Additionally, we would need to measure the wind force and a few angles. These days, probably primary school kids play around with this kind of stuff; someone's son or grandson could likely design such a setup in a few minutes and hook it up to an Arduino. As for the Arduino—I've used one for measurements before, but a friend put the electronics together for me. The data-logger software shouldn't be an issue.

    Let's put that aside for now. However, I am wondering whether testing a single panel would be enough, or if we need the whole sail. What do you think? We know that a single panel behaves differently than a full sail. We would likely need to measure both. As for the SJR sail, we know we'd use a typical set, similar to the "Amiina." But what would an unsplit junk sail look like? Is that known?

    Also, what scale should the models be? Would the mast really need to be at least 2 meters high, as Marchaj recommends?

    Those are all my doubts for now. Best regards, Jan

    Last modified: 28 Jul 2026 15:53 | Anonymous member
  • 28 Jul 2026 09:52
    Reply # 13658122 on 13653957

    Thanks. That worked.

    The hover board was just an idea I had when writing the post. I've never heard of it before. S.

    1 file
    Last modified: 28 Jul 2026 11:20 | Anonymous member
  • 28 Jul 2026 00:31
    Reply # 13657955 on 13653957

    I would suggest using "attach file" (at the bottom of the edit window) instead, because in my opinion, copy-pasting causes the image to disappear after a while. However, those added via "attach file" stay put. While I was digging through the forum this winter looking for materials on SJR — (smile) — I noticed that many photos uploaded via copy-paste had vanished from the forum.
    By the way, was the hoverboard idea really implemented?

    Regards- Jan

  • 28 Jul 2026 00:03
    Reply # 13657941 on 13653957

    Eureka, I found it!

    But it's too big to copy and paste.

    The hoverboard idea was just a though I had to float the test sample on air, rather than water and be friction free.


    Last modified: 28 Jul 2026 00:06 | Anonymous member
  • 27 Jul 2026 22:34
    Reply # 13657892 on 13653957

    Hi Slieve !

    Thank you for the reply. I don't think anyone wants you to run tests.

    Keep writing your memoirs, because they will definitely be interesting. We are all waiting! (I won't say for how long).

    However, it seems to me that it would be interesting if we all conducted a thought experiment titled: "What is the simplest way to compare two sails without making major mistakes?"

    Especially since, as I understand, you occasionally take part in model testing? The idea with the air cushion sounds intriguing. I must admit, this is the first time I've heard of such a thing. Could you send a link? I also don't think a heel angle study is necessary. As I've just checked, Marchaj seems to have intentionally limited the heel in his research.

    Regards - Jan
    Last modified: 27 Jul 2026 22:35 | Anonymous member
  • 27 Jul 2026 21:23
    Reply # 13657855 on 13653957

    Sorry Jan, but I can’t find the photo of the pool, but that doesn’t matter.

    If you want to test model rigs the last thing you want is to be playing in the bath, and would be better off with mounting them on an air cushion platform with spring balances measuring the lift at right angles to the airflow and drag straight down wind. The rig could heel against a pendulum weight and the angle be measured by eye.

    I did my ‘testing’ some 20 years ago and have moved on. Now it’s just for me to write my memoirs and fade into the background.

    Cheers, Slieve.

  • 27 Jul 2026 10:47
    Reply # 13657585 on 13653957

    Sorry, but I still can't imagine how that pond stand was set up. I'm asking because I'm curious if Karl's idea and a few others could be used to create a simple sail test stand. It would be enough for the conditions at such a stand to be repeatable; it doesn't have to be a wind tunnel, after all, and even if it were – it's a simplified version – I'd call it a "wind generator." For example, a few computer fans creating a "wind wall."

    As is known, Marchaj used a platform submerged in water for his tunnel tests. Unfortunately, it's impossible to ask him about the details and reasons for this solution, but it seems to me that he wanted to limit heel if he used a platform. In Karl's test, heel is considered an unfavorable phenomenon, but Marchaj measured that the heeling force vector (Fp) in upwind sailing is several times greater than the thrust force (Fc) and increases with camber, so I understand that it could also indirectly indicate thrust.
    Therefore, it would be better to measure thrust, not heel, especially since the heel of the sail changes its operating conditions.

    However, I think Karl is heading in the right direction, and if we work together to develop a simple measurement setup, perhaps our plan will finally succeed?

    However, there are a few other topics to discuss before anyone starts taking measurements, so that we can be sure we know what we're measuring and how we're measuring it.

    Best regards, Jan.

  • 27 Jul 2026 08:52
    Reply # 13657559 on 13653957

    Yes Jan, I only race, and it is quite challenging. Sailing fast is not enough. Tactics and the use (or abuse) of the racing rules makes all the difference.

    No, I don’t think we would learn anything from rigs that small. I started to modify a Mirror dinghy, at 10’ 10” long, but then realised helmsman ability and weight would mask performance differences so went for a bigger boat (31 feet). I feel that for real performance testing the hulls would need to be keelboats at least 20 feet long, such as Hunter Squibs or Hunter Europas.

    At the London Boat Show the small displays often simply had boards with posters displayed so the potential customers simply walked past unless something stood out. Having something colourful moving helped to catch the eye, and the whirr of the fan helped as well. When there was a lull in potential customers it gave us on the stand something to play with adjusting the tow ropes. The boat hulls had no keel so a single boat would be blown to the outside wall and stick. The strings kept them to the middle of the trough and by adjusting the lengths between boats they would keep off the sides. The SJR seemed to have strong drive, but I didn’t know what sail areas were involved, so can’t make a useful judgment. It was popular as it was different to known rigs, and it was pink!

    Cheers, Slieve.

    PS Oops, we're getting away from the importance of Karl’s testing.


    Last modified: 27 Jul 2026 08:55 | Anonymous member
  • 26 Jul 2026 19:41
    Reply # 13657423 on 13653957
    Hi Slieve !

    Thanks for the reply. I'm guessing you probably fall into the first group. So, I'll ask another question: Do you think such a regatta (SJR vs UJR model on identical hulls) would make sense? 

    Oh, one more thing: Was that round pond with the fan some kind of tug of war, or were they just pulling each other in the same direction like a carousel?

    Cheers - Jan


    Last modified: 26 Jul 2026 21:34 | Anonymous member
<< First  < Prev   1   2   3   4   5   ...   Next >  Last >> 
       " ...there is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing about in junk-rigged boats" 
                                                               - the Chinese Water Rat

                                                              Site contents © the Junk Rig Association and/or individual authors

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software