Hong Kong 3mt Sampan

<< First  < Prev   1   2   Next >  Last >> 
  • 25 Feb 2023 20:06
    Reply # 13110678 on 13066650

    I just saw, the "Junk Blue Book" is not in the library. Here it is:


    https://indigenousboats.blogspot.com/p/junk-blue-book.html


    Alex

  • 25 Feb 2023 20:01
    Reply # 13110676 on 13066650

    Hi Daniele

    In the "Junk Blue Book" (boats from Vietnam, made by the U.S. Navy in the sixties) I found 3 different ways to have a hoistable rudder:

    Picture S368 the rudder sliding up and down a steel bar

    Pictures 298 and 303 the same in wood

    Pictures S62, S63, S91, S328 s slot in the sternpost

    The boats on pictures 298, 303, 328 are junk rigged.

    The people from Vietnam found wonderful solutions for their boats using local material and simple technics. It is well worth having a look at that.


    Alex






    7 files
  • 25 Feb 2023 16:33
    Reply # 13110520 on 13107081
    Deleted user
    Anonymous wrote:
    Anonymous wrote:

    A rudder, slightly raked. I am still thinking about a proper way to hoist it, I will have to use ropes, as Chinese did.

    I guess a good question is how "authentic" you wish to be. That is, would it be ok to use a modern-ish winch to lift the rudder? Does the rudder have to be floating, held by lines to keep it in place? Using a very long hinge pin and a rudder with no balance could provide a stable enough (for a small craft) anchor in both raised and lowered position.  Balance could be provided as well if the rudder is split but the mounting would probably have to be metal to do it. I said winch, by which I meant a boat trailer kind of deal with a forward facing crank but I realize now that a block and tackle would probably work just fine. What I can see in my mind would allow 45 degrees port and stbd. I am assuming that the tiller would move up and down with the rudder as the originals seem to have. The lower position being the comfortable position and the up position being for beaching or avoiding grounding.

    I have added a rough file trying to show what I mean.  The rudder is shown in it's down position. I have not shown a proper sheer shape or the hull sides that would extend beyond the transom. The blue line is the hauling line for raising the rudder. I have not added the balance option because it does not see that was common in the originals. The hauling pulley should be as close to the centre line as it can be without interfering with the rest of the rudder works. The weight of the rudder would determine if extra mechanical advantage would be needed for lifting or if some form of line to pull it down against flotation was needed. George Buehler's assertion that there should be a good amount of play in the hing is probably worth following. Regular scraping of the pivot pin would be part ones routine for keeping things moving, the fact that this one moves up and down means the whole pin can be examined and cleaned regularly unlike the normal setup. The rudder is attached to the hinge pin only at the very top and bottom, though I am guessing it would be possible to add a third attachment point between the lower and top hull anchor points if they were far enough apart. I think for this size craft it would not be needed.


    I would surely consider a system as you suggest.

    I know some boats in the Adriatic area had rising rudders on pins.

    I will try something in this direction also.

  • 25 Feb 2023 15:59
    Reply # 13110507 on 13066650
    Deleted user

    Dear All,

    sorry for my late reply. I've been a bit too busy.

    I designed a new sail, hopefully more Hong Kong style. What do you think? 

    For the rudder question.

    As you said, there is not that much information about how those rudders were hung.

    Graeme, in the image you posted those two large ropes attached to the rudder are brought up to the bow, as you say. I saw that in an illustration. That is not the way I was thnking.

    Other illustrations which I do not have on this PC show a rope attached to the first of the romboid holes that you often see in the rudder, that goes horizontally back to the transom and then to the deck. When the rudder is in the lowered position, this rope is thightened to keep the rudder attached to the transom. When the rudder is hoisted, the rope is let loose and the rudder is kept in position by the passage though the deck, and if needed by an other rope that is held back to the transom at a higher point.

    I decided to draw something like this: the rudder will pass though a hole at deck level ('A' in the illustration attached), and then goes down to a wood block ('B' in the illustration, in purple). The block B has a semi cylindrical recess to accept the rudder. wich will be held there by a rope ('C') that will go around the rudder, back to the transom, ant up to the deck, to both sides ('D). Moreover, there will be a similar recess in the back of the keel ('E' in blue), but no rope here.

    What do you think?? Will it be strong enough? Will the rudder stay in position? Will it move away in strong conditions?

    I'm not sure if to design a hoisting mechanism, or if the rudder will be light enough to be easily hoisted by hand. Anyway, in case, I would go for a traditonal mounting, so a stick going from one 'wing' on the transom to the other, with a windlass (not sure if this term is correct...) and a rope attached to the rudder.

    Just to be clear, in the attached pic you see the inner transom, which will be convered by a fake transom (you can see it in my previous pics).

    Thank you for your interesting comments and files and suggestions. I will be more than happy to have your comments on the rudder.

    Daniele

    2 files
    Last modified: 25 Feb 2023 16:27 | Deleted user
  • 22 Feb 2023 17:12
    Reply # 13107081 on 13077270
    Anonymous wrote:

    A rudder, slightly raked. I am still thinking about a proper way to hoist it, I will have to use ropes, as Chinese did.

    I guess a good question is how "authentic" you wish to be. That is, would it be ok to use a modern-ish winch to lift the rudder? Does the rudder have to be floating, held by lines to keep it in place? Using a very long hinge pin and a rudder with no balance could provide a stable enough (for a small craft) anchor in both raised and lowered position.  Balance could be provided as well if the rudder is split but the mounting would probably have to be metal to do it. I said winch, by which I meant a boat trailer kind of deal with a forward facing crank but I realize now that a block and tackle would probably work just fine. What I can see in my mind would allow 45 degrees port and stbd. I am assuming that the tiller would move up and down with the rudder as the originals seem to have. The lower position being the comfortable position and the up position being for beaching or avoiding grounding.

    I have added a rough file trying to show what I mean.  The rudder is shown in it's down position. I have not shown a proper sheer shape or the hull sides that would extend beyond the transom. The blue line is the hauling line for raising the rudder. I have not added the balance option because it does not see that was common in the originals. The hauling pulley should be as close to the centre line as it can be without interfering with the rest of the rudder works. The weight of the rudder would determine if extra mechanical advantage would be needed for lifting or if some form of line to pull it down against flotation was needed. George Buehler's assertion that there should be a good amount of play in the hing is probably worth following. Regular scraping of the pivot pin would be part ones routine for keeping things moving, the fact that this one moves up and down means the whole pin can be examined and cleaned regularly unlike the normal setup. The rudder is attached to the hinge pin only at the very top and bottom, though I am guessing it would be possible to add a third attachment point between the lower and top hull anchor points if they were far enough apart. I think for this size craft it would not be needed.

    1 file
    Last modified: 22 Feb 2023 17:17 | Anonymous member
  • 22 Feb 2023 15:32
    Reply # 13106985 on 13066650
    Anonymous member (Administrator)

    As someone mentioned Hans Van Tilburg I recalled I had some photos from him - this one shows a rudder arrangement most clearly and it looks very similar to the California junk arrangement, though in this case there is much more incline on the rudder post 

    2 files
  • 22 Feb 2023 10:01
    Reply # 13106664 on 13066650

    Hello

    Scrolling in one of Audemards books I fond the attached picture. The board at the stern is not ment for steering but it could be alternated for that. Sliding it up and down one could still steer with it.


    Alex

    1 file
  • 20 Feb 2023 22:56
    Reply # 13104909 on 13066650
    Anonymous member (Administrator)

    All good stuff. Thanks Alex for the reminder about Tilburg.

    Google search shows plenty of Viking 2-point mounted steer boards,

    As Arne says - an efficient spade rudder (with a lot of balance!) - but also it would seem clearly to have evolved from the oar - it's oar-shaped.  It's a logical and obvious step from  steering oar to a 2-point mounted steer board (or rudder) - on the starboard side, (although there are also early depictions of Egyptian twin steering oars, mounted both sides).

    It's reasonable to suppose that the Viking rudder evolved from the steering oar.

    but were the Vikings the first?   Or not?   

    1400 BC picture of Egyptian river boat seems to show clear 2-point mounting -

    - until you look closer and see there is no tiller. Despite claims to the contrary, I suggest this is merely a steering oar.

    Anyway, the Chinese rudder, mounted without pintles in the centre of a transom - with no stern post - fore-and-aft tiller - seems to indicate a quite separate evolutionary pathway. As has been suggested - maybe evolved from the yuloh.



    Well, back to Daniele's design - how are you going to mount the rudder Daniele?



    Last modified: 21 Feb 2023 01:14 | Anonymous member (Administrator)
  • 20 Feb 2023 22:12
    Reply # 13104880 on 13104010
    Arnewrote:

    Very interesting.
    However, I think the writer made a mistake when classifying the steering device on Viking ships as “steering oars”.

    Steerboard, for the original right hand steering (is that were right hand steering in cars came from?). Apparently also on Egyptian ships (two point attachment). Of course one would not want to foul the steerboard on the dock and so were always moored with the steerboard away from the dock so the side at dock was the Port side.

    Powerboats are all right hand drive (or centre) but pass to the right... shrug.
  • 20 Feb 2023 12:11
    Reply # 13104010 on 13066650
    Anonymous member (Administrator)

    Very interesting.
    However, I think the writer made a mistake when classifying the steering device on Viking ships as “steering oars”.
    An oar is only connected to the boat at one point, so the effort to steer any vessel much bigger than a row-boat, would be very high.

    The side rudder on Viking ships were connected to the boat at two points, one at the rail (from where it can be disconnected to let the rudder swing up) and one further down the side. Steering was thus achieved by rotating the shaft as on modern rudders. A tiller, pointing about  at right angle to the CL lets one man swing the rudder quite easily. In fact, these rudders were efficient spade rudders, capable of controlling ships of up to 30 tons.

    Arne


    Last modified: 20 Feb 2023 15:46 | Anonymous member (Administrator)
<< First  < Prev   1   2   Next >  Last >> 
       " ...there is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing about in junk-rigged boats" 
                                                               - the Chinese Water Rat

                                                              Site contents © the Junk Rig Association and/or individual authors

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software