Converting 10t gaffer to single mast junk

  • 14 Apr 2023 21:44
    Reply # 13168399 on 13127979

    Hi Jim,

    Years ago I built a couple of carbon masts professionally. I hired an engineer to specify carbon and glass layers to reach a desired stiffness/strength for each separate mast.  Eventually this left me with enough data to interpolate subsequent masts. Obviously this is not a one size fits all thing.

    The woodcore masts I built in two halves which is easier to lay up the carbon. The halves are glued together and  the join taped heavily.

    A good way to approach carbon wall thickness is to use the wall thickness of a suitable aluminum tube mast. A carbon mast would be both stiffer and stronger than an aluminum mast of same wall thickness. Of course one can vary wall thickness of a carbon mast along its length to resist the loads at corresponding locations which would be the most efficient use of materials.  

    Regards,

    Rudolf


  • 13 Apr 2023 22:14
    Reply # 13167170 on 13165635
    Anonymous wrote:

    The thin walled inner wood mast is really just a mold to wrap many layers of glass and carbon round to make a very stiff very strong mast. I wonder if any members have tried this combination.


    I built two freestanding masts that way, a wooden strip mold covered with glass and carbon. They are not very tall, at 6.5 m and 8.6 m but I think it could work for bigger masts.

    Rudolf

    Hi Rudolf, that is very interesting to hear.

    Can I ask a few questions?

    How many layers of each did you lay and what type of weave did you choose. Do the glass and carbon bond well together and are there any tips you learnt you could pass on.

    Thanks, Jim

  • 12 Apr 2023 20:52
    Reply # 13165635 on 13164157

    The thin walled inner wood mast is really just a mold to wrap many layers of glass and carbon round to make a very stiff very strong mast. I wonder if any members have tried this combination.


    I built two freestanding masts that way, a wooden strip mold covered with glass and carbon. They are not very tall, at 6.5 m and 8.6 m but I think it could work for bigger masts.

    Rudolf

  • 12 Apr 2023 19:58
    Reply # 13165552 on 13164858
    Anonymous wrote:

    Jim, first of all, hats off for you!
    Only now did I realise that you have both designed and built your boat. I could never do that.

    Now I have plonked my suggested sail with 60° yard on top of your sailplan with a gaffrig (GR). As you can see, the lead of the JR is much shorter than that of the GR. Still, I would not be surprised if it turns out to work as it is. It would be desirable though to be able to move the sail about 20cm forward. One way is to make the mast step as a short slot, so that the mast can be raked 1-2° forward, if needed.

    I also wonder about the rudder. To me it looks to be on the small side. How does it work today? What about ‘filling in’ that lower corner and then add an endplate to it? I have received reports that an endplate increases the efficiency of their rudders.

    I think I will draw another junk sail, almost the same as shown here, but with the yard angle lowered to 55°. This will allow you to increase the mast balance past 26%. Just remember, I don’t have practical experience with this high mast balance. At one point, the sail may decide to become unstable and not feather correctly. However, I am quite confident that the sail ill behave itself with 25% balance. The mast will rob some camber at the port tack, but one cannot have it all. At least I know that this mast effect hardly is noticeable with 22% mast balance.

    Arne


    (See Arne's sketches section 7, photo 16)

    Thanks for sending both rig ideas.

    Interesting that you picked up on the rudder. I drew it that shape because I liked the look of it. The more I read I realised a squared shape is much more efficient and it ended up very similar to the one you sketched!

    I can't claim to have built the whole boat as I worked as a tutor with Master Shipwright Bill Foster and we built her with nine students in Tasmania launching in 98.


  • 12 Apr 2023 15:30
    Reply # 13165107 on 13127979
    Anonymous member (Administrator)

    Well, here is the JR with 55° yard angle, which allows one to shift the sail another 20cm forward of the shown position. Still, I hesitate with recommending this. I would not be afraid of trying it if the boat were mine, and with my local pottering in mind. It’s different when I know that the vessel is to travel half around the world with this slightly experimental setup.

    Now, just for fun, I added a jib, meant to be of lightweight spinnaker cloth.

    And then there is this way of going from gaff to junk...

    Arne


  • 12 Apr 2023 11:05
    Reply # 13164858 on 13127979
    Anonymous member (Administrator)

    Jim, first of all, hats off for you!
    Only now did I realise that you have both designed and built your boat. I could never do that.

    Now I have plonked my suggested sail with 60° yard on top of your sailplan with a gaffrig (GR). As you can see, the lead of the JR is much shorter than that of the GR. Still, I would not be surprised if it turns out to work as it is. It would be desirable though to be able to move the sail about 20cm forward. One way is to make the mast step as a short slot, so that the mast can be raked 1-2° forward, if needed.

    I also wonder about the rudder. To me it looks to be on the small side. How does it work today? What about ‘filling in’ that lower corner and then add an endplate to it? I have received reports that an endplate increases the efficiency of their rudders.

    I think I will draw another junk sail, almost the same as shown here, but with the yard angle lowered to 55°. This will allow you to increase the mast balance past 26%. Just remember, I don’t have practical experience with this high mast balance. At one point, the sail may decide to become unstable and not feather correctly. However, I am quite confident that the sail ill behave itself with 25% balance. The mast will rob some camber at the port tack, but one cannot have it all. At least I know that this mast effect hardly is noticeable with 22% mast balance.

    Arne


    (See Arne's sketches section 7, photo 16)

    Last modified: 12 Apr 2023 11:07 | Anonymous member (Administrator)
  • 11 Apr 2023 19:30
    Reply # 13164205 on 13163605
    Anonymous wrote:

    The suggested rigs for Jim’s boat, so far, cannot be called low AR. With an AR of 2.18, my suggested version (yellow lines) is probably the highest-AR sloop rig that I have drawn. Its chord is only 58% of the waterline, and when setting with the shown high mast balance (25%), it should be unusually easy to steer downwind, and with a good clearance between the squared-out boom and the sea.

    I am still uncertain if the whole rig can sit this far aft. I wish I knew more about how that cutter originally was rigged and how its steering balance was with that rig.

    Arne


    Thanks for taking an interest Arne.

    The attached photo is the original sail plan when we sailed back  though I never made the tops'l as the hull is very easily driven and she has plenty of sail area. The roach and battens in the mainsail were inspired by the Carrs on Curlew, though the battens proved a pain and she had a bit of weather helm so I cut away the roach plus another 18 inches which gave her good balance. We sailed with that Yankee Genoa on a roller furler which simplified the sailing (we left with a six week old so basically my wife Lennie looked after Stella and down below and I looked after the sailing.

    Having running backstays you can't tension the foil so they destroy themselves in time. For the last ten years I've been sailing with hank on jibs which are much smaller and set from the crosstrees Dyarchy/Hiscock style, balance is still ok though.

    I.too wonder if the mast should be further forward but ergonomically the ship won't work as well. If it is a real problem down the track I will reposition the fore hatch and put it there.

    1 file
  • 11 Apr 2023 19:09
    Reply # 13164157 on 13163590
    Anonymous wrote:
    Jim wrote:

    Thank you David for your advice.

    Yes weight of sail and battens will be an issue. I hope to use carbon battens and a lightish to medium weight cloth. Would you recommend a weight and perhaps a manufacturer. I don't mind paying a bit extra for something that will last and be UV stable.

    When we sailed back from Oz we cruised in company for a while with a Hereshoff cat ketch called Pollen Path. The unstayed masts were layers of glass over hollow spars. Randy complained that they were a bit whippy at the mast head but they must have been strong as she survived the Queen's Birthday Storm, when many were lost.

    Talking of old cruising friends, I wonder if anyone has heard of someone we met. I think his name was Roger and he had a green junk rigged steel Tahiti ketch called Irene. He sailed single handed and I was very impressed watching him thread his way through the reefs in Tonga. He was also a very nice chap.

    Thanks again, Jim 

    It's not only about rig weight. It's also about manageability in difficult conditions - gybing a big low AR sail is not for the faint-hearted.

    Top Gun 9 would be a good choice of cloth.

    Flexible unstayed masts are unpleasant to sail with. Please don't use glass except as a thin sheathing layer over wood, to protect against abrasion. Its strength/weight and stiffness/weight ratios make it a poor choice for the structure. For your wooden boat, a wooden mast is the obvious choice. 

    I met Roger and Irene in the R Guadiana, between Portugal and Spain, on my way south in 2006, but your meeting is probably more recent.

    How interesting that you met Roger. Our paths crossed in 2000.

    The thin walled inner wood mast is really just a mold to wrap many layers of glass and carbon round to make a very stiff very strong mast. I wonder if any members have tried this combination.

    Progress so far: stripped out the forward cabin . Will clean and paint then fit two more floors and then fit a 4 foot 6 mast step over the top of the then 6 floors which will also joint onto the end of the existing mast step. Other work will be altering the fore deck structure to take the partners. The Douglas fir arrives next week but we won't start construction till July.

    Thanks for the sail cloth into.

    1 file
  • 11 Apr 2023 09:49
    Reply # 13163605 on 13127979
    Anonymous member (Administrator)

    The suggested rigs for Jim’s boat, so far, cannot be called low AR. With an AR of 2.18, my suggested version (yellow lines) is probably the highest-AR sloop rig that I have drawn. Its chord is only 58% of the waterline, and when setting with the shown high mast balance (25%), it should be unusually easy to steer downwind, and with a good clearance between the squared-out boom and the sea.

    I am still uncertain if the whole rig can sit this far aft. I wish I knew more about how that cutter originally was rigged and how its steering balance was with that rig.

    Arne


  • 11 Apr 2023 08:58
    Reply # 13163590 on 13162956
    Jim wrote:

    Thank you David for your advice.

    Yes weight of sail and battens will be an issue. I hope to use carbon battens and a lightish to medium weight cloth. Would you recommend a weight and perhaps a manufacturer. I don't mind paying a bit extra for something that will last and be UV stable.

    When we sailed back from Oz we cruised in company for a while with a Hereshoff cat ketch called Pollen Path. The unstayed masts were layers of glass over hollow spars. Randy complained that they were a bit whippy at the mast head but they must have been strong as she survived the Queen's Birthday Storm, when many were lost.

    Talking of old cruising friends, I wonder if anyone has heard of someone we met. I think his name was Roger and he had a green junk rigged steel Tahiti ketch called Irene. He sailed single handed and I was very impressed watching him thread his way through the reefs in Tonga. He was also a very nice chap.

    Thanks again, Jim 

    It's not only about rig weight. It's also about manageability in difficult conditions - gybing a big low AR sail is not for the faint-hearted.

    Top Gun 9 would be a good choice of cloth.

    Flexible unstayed masts are unpleasant to sail with. Please don't use glass except as a thin sheathing layer over wood, to protect against abrasion. Its strength/weight and stiffness/weight ratios make it a poor choice for the structure. For your wooden boat, a wooden mast is the obvious choice. 

    I met Roger and Irene in the R Guadiana, between Portugal and Spain, on my way south in 2006, but your meeting is probably more recent.

       " ...there is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing about in junk-rigged boats" 
                                                               - the Chinese Water Rat

                                                              Site contents © the Junk Rig Association and/or individual authors

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software