Aviateur 5.70 Conversion

  • 30 Nov 2013 22:29
    Reply # 1448918 on 1418008
    Anonymous member (Administrator)

    Stavanger, Sat

    Thanks for the sail plans, Antoine.

    I am sure both will work. If only we could have had two identical boats, one fitted with the Johanna rig and one with the Fantail rig…

    My hunch is that there would not be a radical difference between them in upwind performance. The performance would mainly depend on how much camber the sails get.

    Straight downwind I guess the lower AR Fantail sail might be faster, but on the other hand, it would need to be swung forward earlier to off-load the rudder. On none of my boats with Johanna style sails have I needed to do this. On both my last boats, Broremann and Frøken Sørensen, I run out of courage before I run out of rudder, so then I drop a panel or two…

    David Thatcher compares his cambered Fantail sail with his former, flat, HM sail and from that experience, he seems to rule out the HM sail. I think that is a bit unfair comparison. When I replaced my Malena’s flat HM sail with a cambered panel HM sail of the same size and AR, it was like having a turbocharger added. That was back in 1994  -  it’s only 6 months now to the 20-years anniversary of that blue, cambered panel sail.

    So my suggestion, again, is that both sails you have drawn will do fine, and that they will anyway work a lot better than a flat sail. It is more up to you what you like.

    Good luck!

    Cheers Arne

    PS: Btw, the default rake of my masts is vertical, but these sails have proven (to me) that they work with any mast rake from 2 degrees aft to  over 5 degrees forward.

    Last modified: 30 Nov 2013 22:46 | Anonymous member (Administrator)
  • 30 Nov 2013 20:47
    Reply # 1448874 on 1418008
    Deleted user

    Hello Antoine,

    Thanks for sending those through. I expect there will many expert opinions coming through and from people who have a lot more knowledge and experience than I do, although I have now had both the traditional PJR rig sail, and the cambered fan shape sail on Footprints. I think that for Aviateur I would go for the fan shaped sail with some camber built in. We have found on Fantail, Footprints, and Tystie that these sails work best with the mast raked forward between 3 to 6 degrees. This provides more opportunity to find the right balance of sail position in relation to the CE of the sail and CLR of the hull. and I know in the case of Footprints the sail set a lot better once I raked the mast forward. I think that even with the junk sail on such design that you would still get good sailing performance, and with the cambered panel fan shaped sail the boat would develop a lot of power both reaching and running. Even though Footprints is a cruising yacht with her cambered panel sail and flat bottom she surfs very readily and we regularly see speeds of 8 to 9 knots when going downwind and we have plenty of sail up. Our top speed to date has been 10.9 knots. Footprints has always had a lot of weather helm but I have been learning that for any off the wind sailing I need to cant the sail across the mast as far as I can so that we now have almost 3 meters (for a 6.3 m boom length) of boom across the mast and this is neutralizing the weather helm and making the sail and boat a lot more controllable.

    Apart from the technical difficulty of making the sail itself the junk rig would be easy to put together. Battens, yard and boom could probably all be aluminum but apart from the cost the mast might be best build from carbon for both strength and light weight. I am looking at purchasing a carbon yard for the sail on Footprints to replace my alloy yard which has developed a bend once again. I have found a supplier of Carbon tube here in New Zealand their prices are not too exorbitant.  

  • 30 Nov 2013 18:41
    Reply # 1448829 on 1418008
    Deleted user
    Hi David

    Nice to see i am not the only one considering Aviateur.

    Here are some studies I did today, converting Aviateur to JR. I stayed to a 22m² sail. I did use Johanna and Fantail sail plans to compare. Let me know what you think.

    Aviateur with Fantail rig
    Aviateur with Johanna rig
    Comparaison between Johnna and Fantail on Aviateur

    Antoine
  • 26 Nov 2013 18:02
    Reply # 1446827 on 1418008
    Deleted user

    I have been a frequent visitor to the Aviateur website and am considering building one of these little boats, not to replace Footprints but in addition to, and as foil to the type of sailing I do on Footprints. I think that these would be fun boats to sail and construction should be fairly easy and quick, although I know from past experience that it always takes twice as long to build a boat than what you expect.

    I have also being considering conversion to a junk rig although going more to the fan shaped sail as I have on Footprints with the mast raked forward for balance, and the ability to cant the sail across the mast for downwind work as on Tystie and Footprints. I see though that the designer has now done a smaller version of Aviateur with a cat rig. I think that would be an option I would explore if I was to build one of these boats because you still have the simplicity of a single sail but of a style more suited to the concept of these boats, although a lot more high tech than the junk sail and I expect considerably more cost because unlike a junk sail you would be getting away from DIY.

    I agree that it would be much quicker an easier to convert an older boat but in NZ our existing yacht fleet is getting very old and tired with most boats built back in the 70's and 80's, none of which I would want to own. Plus I like the idea of a boat built from plywood. The construction and hull form of Aviateur is very similar to that of Footprint except of course much more beam in the stern sections.

    Last modified: 27 Nov 2013 06:43 | Deleted user
  • 26 Nov 2013 12:51
    Reply # 1446538 on 1445529
    Deleted user
    Mark Thomasson wrote:

    Antoine,

    Roger Taylor (the no1 junk - small boat sailor), advocates buying second hand and converting.  From what I recall, France is chock-a-block with excellent small yacht, from at least 30 years back.

    As you have access to carbon-fibre, why not put your efforts into a superb rig on an existing hull?


    Mark

    I understand that point, and I sure think that adding another boat (even a small one) in this world is not a necessity.
    Theoretically, modifying an existing boat can only be done with the autorisation of copyright owner, either naval architect or yard.
    I am not sure yet on what to do, working on it. But everything is worth considering.

    Antoine
  • 25 Nov 2013 17:49
    Reply # 1445865 on 1445480
    Antoine ALLAIN wrote:Thanks to both of you for answers.

    David, thanks for pointing at Selway pionneer. It looks a lot like something I had in mind to draw myself. Only one thing, it seems very heavy and low sail area. I will contact them anyway, as it is very interesting.

    Arne, thanks for your advices. I work in a shipyard, and we have a composite shop. I can
    definitively get carbone tubes for a not so expensive price and work on composite. I thought that carbon mast would be to stiff but if you say it's OK I will have a look. Johanna's sail proportion looks good as well as your 6,5m's one. I will look how I can fit it on both aviateur and pionneer.

    Antoine
    I calculate the L/D ratio for the Pioneer 21 to be 270, which is a good figure for an offshore cruising boat. Not so heavy as to be slow, not so light as to be uncomfortable and have little carrying capacity. If you have access to high tech construction methods, the construction can be lighter, and the ballast can be heavier (or you can carry more stores and water). The rig is certainly small, and I would put a sail of 230 sq ft on this boat, for cruising. 
  • 25 Nov 2013 13:23
    Reply # 1445529 on 1418008

    Antoine,

    Roger Taylor (the no1 junk - small boat sailor), advocates buying second hand and converting.  From what I recall, France is chock-a-block with excellent small yacht, from at least 30 years back.

    As you have access to carbon-fibre, why not put your efforts into a superb rig on an existing hull?

  • 25 Nov 2013 10:38
    Reply # 1445480 on 1418008
    Deleted user
    Thanks to both of you for answers.

    David, thanks for pointing at Selway pionneer. It looks a lot like something I had in mind to draw myself. Only one thing, it seems very heavy and low sail area. I will contact them anyway, as it is very interesting.

    Arne, thanks for your advices. I work in a shipyard, and we have a composite shop. I can
    definitively get carbone tubes for a not so expensive price and work on composite. I thought that carbon mast would be to stiff but if you say it's OK I will have a look. Johanna's sail proportion looks good as well as your 6,5m's one. I will look how I can fit it on both aviateur and pionneer.

    Antoine
  • 22 Nov 2013 22:24
    Reply # 1444368 on 1444359
    Anonymous member (Administrator)
    David Tyler wrote:Arne, you might have missed this.

    Quote:
    "I am generally speaking not interested in racing and looking for simplicity first.

    My plan is to have a small boat for having some time at sea, in the next few years."


    Ah, I see, thanks David, then some of my questions have already been answered...

    Arne

  • 22 Nov 2013 22:00
    Reply # 1444359 on 1418008
    Arne, you might have missed this.

    Quote:
    "I am generally speaking not interested in racing and looking for simplicity first.

    My plan is to have a small boat for having some time at sea, in the next few years."
       " ...there is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing about in junk-rigged boats" 
                                                               - the Chinese Water Rat

                                                              Site contents © the Junk Rig Association and/or individual authors

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software