New sail for Tystie

  • 25 Feb 2012 19:26
    Reply # 835659 on 835301
    David Tyler wrote:
    Annie Hill wrote:Oh!  it looks like I did it the sailmaker's way (actually, in my case, probably the dressmaker's way!), but I never fed more than one panel of the sail through the throat of the machine, so didn't find it an issue.

    I lapped the seams (not like a dressmaker) so that I didn't have to turn the sail over.  Once they were sewn, I went back and attached the batten pockets.
    Yes, that's right, you did it like a genuine sailmaker. It wasn't so bad, because your sail is half the size of mine. Also, the shelf foot method decreases the size of each panel that has to be fed through. 
     When you build a sail using the "shelf foot" method, you do not join the panels in the same manner that you would if you use Arne's "barrel method" or "broad seaming" and "tuck" methods. This is because each "shelf" is a lens shaped piece of cloth (that's why they'er called "lenses" in shelf foot terminology) that give shape to each panel and also joins the two panels together (the topmost and bottom most lenses are half lenses) so you do not get a panel to panel seam where the batten lies and so Arne's method for putting the batten pockets on does not apply.

    However you still can sew the pockets onto the lens before you sew the lenses on to the panel and that's my standard practice. Because of the way it's done however, you'd still use either the sail makers method or Annie's dress maker method. If Annie did the job afterwards, I must have forgotten to tell her.

    Unfortunately, unless you are making a sail that is made up of separate panels that are tied together when you rig (as I did for Carl Bosteck's Aphrodite) you will ultimately have to be pushing the whole sail through the sewing machine. The trick is to do as much detailing as possible before you join the sail together.

    You could quite probably use Arne's panel joining method to join the lenses to the panel but because there is no batten pocket to cover the seam, it'd look rather untidy.
  • 25 Feb 2012 09:21
    Reply # 835410 on 835158
    Anonymous member (Administrator)
    Annie Hill wrote:Oh!  it looks like I did it the sailmaker's way (actually, in my case, probably the dressmaker's way!), but I never fed more than one panel of the sail through the throat of the machine, so didn't find it an issue.

    I lapped the seams (not like a dressmaker) so that I didn't have to turn the sail over.  Once they were sewn, I went back and attached the batten pockets.

                                                                                    Stavanger, Sat

    Annie,

    your method doesn’t sound too tricky, but it still seems to involve a lot more sewing to join two batten panels: Two seams along each side of the lenses and two (or four?) seams holding the batten pocket. That should sum up to 6 or 8 seams, all with some cloth passed under the arm of the sewing machine. In comparison, my amateur method b needs only two seams, one for joining the panels and one to fit the batten pocket. No need to roll up any canvas to pass it under the arm.

    Arne

  • 25 Feb 2012 08:34
    Reply # 835400 on 835393
    Gary Pick wrote:The Odyssey III I used was wide enough to cut my lower panels from without having to sew strips together. What is the advantage of using broadseam in a JR sail?
    Just curious.
    Gary
    If you've got cloth wide enough to cut the panel out of a single piece - then putting in tucks is the way to go.
    If you've got narrow cloth, that is going to need seaming together, then vertical seams and broad-seaming is the way to go. Especially if the sail is big, and there are many seams across the panel, which means that each seam doesn't make too abrupt a "corner" as it changes from parallel within the quadrilateral, to triangular outside it. 

  • 25 Feb 2012 07:49
    Reply # 835393 on 833895
    The Odyssey III I used was wide enough to cut my lower panels from without having to sew strips together. What is the advantage of using broadseam in a JR sail?
    Just curious.
    Gary
  • 25 Feb 2012 04:45
    Reply # 835305 on 833895
    Arne,
    If you are still going to get an entire panel out of one cloth, then I would suggest using the tuck method. It comes to the same thing in the end. The tucks can be spaced about 900mm apart, and they will have exactly the effect as the broad seams on our 920mm wide cloth. Make sense?
  • 25 Feb 2012 04:42
    Reply # 835302 on 833895
    First day's work:
    We set out the bottom panels of each sail, cut the cloth for each, and got it all taped together before lunch. A slow start, because David hasn't made a sail before, and I have to remember how it all goes.
    After lunch, we did the same with panel two, and made a start on panel three before it was beer o'clock, and time to stop.
    There are seven cloths in each panel. The three after seams are straight, and will be sewn first, from end to end. The forward seams will be broad-seamed, and the tape is only stuck down within the quadrilateral, leaving the ends to be assembled as each seam is sewn. 
    More tomorrow.
  • 25 Feb 2012 04:34
    Reply # 835301 on 835158
    Annie Hill wrote:Oh!  it looks like I did it the sailmaker's way (actually, in my case, probably the dressmaker's way!), but I never fed more than one panel of the sail through the throat of the machine, so didn't find it an issue.

    I lapped the seams (not like a dressmaker) so that I didn't have to turn the sail over.  Once they were sewn, I went back and attached the batten pockets.
    Yes, that's right, you did it like a genuine sailmaker. It wasn't so bad, because your sail is half the size of mine. Also, the shelf foot method decreases the size of each panel that has to be fed through. 
    I'm using Arne's method because of the sheer size of these sails. I would probably use the sailmaker's method on a sail the size of yours - but then again, on a smaller sail the stresses are lower and the sailmaker's method is less necessary. I don't know.
    I'm 99% sure that Arne's method will be fine for these sails, but I didn't want to suggest it to you until I'd tried it myself.
  • 24 Feb 2012 23:43
    Reply # 835158 on 833895
    Oh!  it looks like I did it the sailmaker's way (actually, in my case, probably the dressmaker's way!), but I never fed more than one panel of the sail through the throat of the machine, so didn't find it an issue.

    I lapped the seams (not like a dressmaker) so that I didn't have to turn the sail over.  Once they were sewn, I went back and attached the batten pockets.
  • 24 Feb 2012 19:03
    Reply # 834951 on 833895
    Anonymous member (Administrator)

                                                                Stavanger, Friday

    David

    It surprises (and gladdens) me to read that you will try one of my methods for joining the batten panels. I bet you will find that you save a lot of work. The amateur method b should work even when using broadseams, which I guess you will use. Nowadays I too wonder if the barrel cut method should be combined with using broadseams, at least if I aim for camber in the 12 – 15% range.

    I agree that amateur method a is not the best, but at least it worked on Malena’s experimental sail, made in 1994. Little did I know that this sail would stay operational without a stitch being mended for 16 years. It took years after I made it before I finally started to understand how little stress there was in the junk sails in general, and in the cambered panel junk sails in particular. When Malena’s sail finally fell apart (see photo article from the JRA rally in Stavanger 2010), the seams were still OK, but the nylon cloth had had enough after being left uncovered 24/7 for all those years.

    The amateur methods have two assets over conventional sailmaker methods, apart from being easy to do:

    • The batten panel joining seam is much better protected from shafe from the lazyjacks and mast lift than when using the professional methods (that goes for both amateur method a and b).
    • When amateur method b is used, the batten pockets will cover most of the batten panel joining seams so this critical seam will see very little sunlight. The gaps between the sections of batten pockets can of course be covered with small strips of canvas for the same reason.

    So, although technically weaker, these methods may result in long-lasting sails.

    I see now that the 3 – 4 lower battens of Fantail’s sail are nearly parallel (much unlike the Colvin sails). In a way you have got the best out of the Hasler-McLeod sail while retaining the good-looking fan shape. Smart!

    Good luck!

    Arne

    PS: If some of you wonder what on earth I am babbling about, then check " The Cambered Panel Junk Rig, Chapter 5" found on "my" page.

    http://www.junkrigassociation.org/arne

     

    Last modified: 24 Feb 2012 22:47 | Anonymous member (Administrator)
  • 24 Feb 2012 05:01
    Reply # 834028 on 833895
    Ja, I knew that was coming :-). It was just a matter of when. BTW, I've also decided  to use Arne's sewing methods. Well join the club, I'll be starting my sails end of next week.

    For those who don't know, I decided not to go ahead with my softwing which would have been the sister to David's rig. Not because it does not work, it works very well indeed from an efficiency point of view but whether it could be made reliable enough for my circumnavigation remains in doubt. So after having done 95% of the work to complete my softwing, I've reluctantly (very) decided to abandon it.

    I will be building a cambered van Loan style rig (drawings and details to be posted in due course). Bob, you'll soon enough know how well a cambered rig does offshore, however I don't expect any more problems than I'd have with a flat sail and I'm sure David feels the same (though not necessarily about my particular rig).

    None of the above will help me get to the JRA NZ rally as it increasingly looks like the launching of La Chica will be set back to April rather than March as hoped. Just to much work for one man :-(
    Last modified: 24 Feb 2012 05:38 | Anonymous member
       " ...there is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing about in junk-rigged boats" 
                                                               - the Chinese Water Rat

                                                              Site contents © the Junk Rig Association and/or individual authors

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software