Rawson 30 Pilot House Junk rig

  • 08 Dec 2016 23:33
    Reply # 4448036 on 4438217
    Anonymous member (Administrator)

    James,

    that Honda sounds good. I prefer outboard engines for the same reason.

    Changes to rudder and rig:
    I suggest you only make changes to one thing at the time. You should either make changes to the rudder and test it under the present rig, or you should convert the rig and test it with the original rudder.

    If you do both at a time, you will not know what made the change in balance, for instance.

    Choice of cloth:
    The one you pointed out seems to be very light, at just 53g/m
    2. That should be only 1.66 ounce/square yard.

    Barrel only or barrel plus broadseams:
    If you are put off by the look of
     any of the wrinkles along the battens of my sails, then add the broadseams. If not, drop them, as the wrinkles hardly rob much speed.

    The big, important thing if you want to sail well, even in light wind, is to give the sail some real camber. The SA/disp is only 16.4  (5443kg or 12000lbs disp), or in other words only
    9.2m
    2/metric ton. I would therefore have aimed for 10% camber, to compensate.

    Sewing machine:
    I have now made a number of sails without a walking foot on my sewing machine. The
    Amateur Method B, which I now use, put little demands on the sewing machine, so I surely can live with a machine with an ordinary foot.

    Arne


  • 08 Dec 2016 22:33
    Reply # 4448004 on 4438217
    Deleted user

    Thanks for the input. I will look into what I can do with the rudder.

    I do not have an inboard prop or shaft. I have a 25 hp honda 4 stroke outboard on a hydraulic lift. I have no prop in the water when I sail. :) I think it is cheaper to just trade in an outboard every so often then deal with all the inboard $$$ repairs $$$.  Hopefully I will get a few more years of service out of the engine, or figure out how to move the boat with a yulo. I would like to be engineless, or at the most an electric motor. I really hate dealing with fuel, maintenance, repairs.  Hopefully one day I will be free of the iron sail...

    I am a motor head, but marine engines live a hard life. 

    From the reports I have read I am not sold on awning fabric for my purpose. If I am going to put so much work into the sail, I need it to last longer then 3-4 years. I am researching uv resistant sailcloth.

    I am thinking about this or similar, coated with this or similar. Any suggestions? 

    If you used something like that would I still be able to produce a nice sail using the barrel method, or if I am spending that sort of money on cloth to try my best to broad seam? We have an old lockstitch singer 27 clone that is extremely beefy, and I could order a walking foot for it. Would this suffice? I know someone with a sailrite, but I am unsure if they would let me use it. 

    Edit: fixed a wrong link

    Last modified: 09 Dec 2016 00:44 | Deleted user
  • 08 Dec 2016 09:48
    Reply # 4446517 on 4438217

    My first thought when looking at sailboatdata was that the rudder looks rather small and being well forward won't be particularly effective. I would suggest that if you adopt one of Arne's wide sail shapes, you might also want to adopt a wider rudder to control it. On the other hand, if you go for a higher AR, as I now prefer, the rudder will probably be OK as it is.

    I spent enough time in BC waters to shoulder logs out of the way, too, and although Tystie's rudder is of a similar quadrilateral shape to that suggested by Arne, I never had any trouble on that score. The main thing is that a shallowly angled forefoot allows the boat to ride over obstructions rather than stopping dead. More important is that if you take the ground when there is any sea running, the boat tends to pitch, and the rudder, if it is level with the bottom of the keel, will hit the ground as the bow pitches upwards. I'd follow Arne's suggestion, but with the after bottom corner of the rudder a little higher than the forward bottom corner. The after corner of the keel shows a similar angle on the sailboatdata profile. 

  • 08 Dec 2016 09:47
    Reply # 4446515 on 4438217
    Anonymous member (Administrator)

    James,

    I didn’t see that one coming! I guess you’d better keep the rudder as it is then.

    Another detail; does your boat have a fixed 3-blade propeller? When sailing, these do their best to put the brakes on, and also destroy the water-flow over the rudder, behind it. It could be an idea to go for a feathering propeller, one day, but not until you have test-sailed the boat with the new rig.

    Any free-standing rudder on the transom should be built to kick up if it hits or catches something.

     

    Arne

    PS: After a good night’s sleep, I guess I would still suggest you add an endplate to the rudder, but made as two separate wings. I would just make them of 10-12mm plywood and edge-glue them onto the side of the rudder, about 10cm above the lower edge. If they are hit by something hard, they will just break or be knocked off without damaging the rudder.


  • 07 Dec 2016 22:31
    Reply # 4445794 on 4438217
    Deleted user

    Arne thank you for the suggestions. I believe the bottom corner is rounded to help shed dead heads. There are a lot of full size trees floating around my current cruising ground, so people out here go out of the way to  ensure their boat can easily shrug them off. I have already ridden over 3 large trees to my knowledge, would your suggested rudder mods effect this ability? I know a lot of people radius the back edge of the rudder here, as well as cutting notches in their keel. I have an internal ballast, so I will not mess with trying to reshape my keel. The rudder is actually quite responsive, but I guess could use some improvement. Thanks for all the info. We also plan to build a wind vane with an auxiliary rudder like you illustrated. I found a copy of Bill's Wind vane book at the local library, and they were about to donate it to their book sale fundraiser, so I offered them $20 for it instead of having to wait for it to get processed and be officially for sale.  After months of looking, $20 for that book was quite a deal. 

    Last modified: 07 Dec 2016 23:59 | Deleted user
  • 07 Dec 2016 17:08
    Reply # 4445218 on 4438217
    Anonymous member (Administrator)

    James,

    I positioned the sail as far forward as I dared, that is with the JR’s CE on the same place as that drawn on the Bm rig. The JR has been drawn with 10% balance, but can easily be shifted forward to 15% or even a bit beyond that, if needed. Normally I have found that when using my cambered panel method, the helm tends to get lighter after the conversion, when close-hauled (if the CE is not moved).

    However, all junk sails will produce some weather helm when reaching and running, in particular sloops.

    The Rawson 30 is struggling with the keel-hung rudder, which gives a rather sluggish response. On the drawing below I have suggested some improvements. The first I would do (even if I dropped the rig conversion), would be to add that lower corner (magenta) and fit an endplate to prevent the waterflow from escaping under the rudder. Step two would be to add that upper corner (red) as well.

    I have also sketched on a transom hung auxiliary rudder, meant for windvane self-steering. You will be surprised to experience how much crisper the response of that rudder is.

    Arne


  • 07 Dec 2016 10:17
    Reply # 4444407 on 4438217
    Deleted user
    Arne,

    Thank you for the drawing. We are going to build using your system. I like to experiment, but it will probably work better and have better resale value if I use something with a proven track record.

    We have decided to use your plan. The boat currently has a bit of weather helm. The manufacture added a bow sprit to counter this in later years. Does this not matter since it is a different rig, and the junk rig is just placed based off of the CLR?

    Thanks. We will be re-reading all of your documents, again, and just go that route. 

    Also, the 40 ft flag pole, is actually 44ft long total.

    Fair winds and following seas,

    James

    Last modified: 07 Dec 2016 12:27 | Deleted user
  • 07 Dec 2016 09:28
    Reply # 4444272 on 4438217
    Anonymous member (Administrator)

    James

    I have made myself a string of master sailplans of 7-panel sails, with the AR rising from 1.80 to 2.25. It was quite a job to make them, but from then on, I save a lot of time and brain power by just picking a suitable sail and scaling it up or down. Recently I have gone all-digital, so I can import jpeg drawings of the boat, scale it to the right size and fit one of those sails, and finally trace its profile. In this case, William Garden’s drawing was so good-looking that I didn’t bother with re-tracing it.

    My reason for the tall yard is that I want the sail to balance between 5 and 15% with respect to mast. This is to cut as little as possible into the cambered panels. High yard angle = little balance, and vice versa.

    The 10° boom rise is to give good clearance when reaching or running. It also gives enough clearance over  the sprayhoods and doghouses, so I don’t need to adjust the topping lifts when reefing the sail. All of the topping lifts on my boats have been made to be standing.

    Frankly, I don’t think a schooner rig is practical on the Rawson 30. A sloop is both faster under sail and cheaper to make. Anyway, to make a schooner rig of that size work, you would have to fit a big balanced rudder on the stern to control it. The only time I would aim for a ketch or schooner rig, is if the boat is long, lean, light and tippy, so needs to have a low-set CE (sharpies?).

    If you go back to my last posting, you will see that I have added the same sailplan, but now with the Bm rig wiped out. That looks tidier, I think. I am afraid that is how my rigs look: One will either get used to them, or will have to look for something else.

    Arne


  • 07 Dec 2016 03:20
    Reply # 4443685 on 4438217
    Deleted user

    This drawing seems to be more accurate Arne.  Hmm... looks like I am going to have to deep dive into the archive to do some soul searching again...

    You must have quite a system down to be able to provide such fantastic illustrations at will. All those conversions and trials you have experienced have refined your skill.

    I have been struggling trying to lay out a schooner for around 600 sq ft of total sail. Do you have any drawings of similar boats I can study more? I like the Hasler drawing below, but it does not translate (for me anyway) properly to my vessel.

    You are getting near 8o degree tack through these days when sea state allows for your sloop rigs correct? Or does this vary for each vessel? (I know, this is probably a dumb question.)

    Have you ever messed with any low aspect ratio rigs Arne? No doubt the aesthetic of the HM layout is just stunning in comparison, but do you think there is a stress variation between the lay outs? 

    I am not going to lie, my schooner drawings so far are just awful, and are wrong. If I manage to get one together that represents a potential reality, I shall share it. 

    Last modified: 07 Dec 2016 03:22 | Deleted user
  • 06 Dec 2016 10:38
    Reply # 4442057 on 4438217
    Anonymous member (Administrator)

    James,

    it is a good thing to be conscious when it comes to structural stress. However, I don’t think you need to worry that your boat will be damaged if you make that hole in the deck. Remember, most sailboats has been given a king plank in the deck to take the horrible compression from the Bermuda rig  -  which does its best to bend the boat into big bananas.

    The forces on the mast step and partners of a freestanding mast are mostly sideways, and a lot lower than in a Bm rig. Take a look at Ingeborg’s partners, (aluminium) below.

    Think of it as a chainplate. The forces needed to heel the boat over is about the same as those working on the chainplates of a stayed rig. Have you ever seen chainplates that have been bolted with 6-8 bolts, like that? Remember, a grp deck like this can take an enormous amount of side-forces. I have plonked freestanding masts through the deck of a number of production boats, and there has never been any problems.

    Of course, if the space for a mast step has already been taken, then it is not an alternative, but I think you should have another look before you drop it. Installing a mast step will be messy anyway. Converting a boat to a new rig is like climbing or rounding a row of obstacles.

    Mast height.
    Have you decided on a sail area, yet? I just checked. A 50sqm Johanna-type sail with SA= 50sqm and AR=2.10 would need a mast with a LAP=11.2m or a total mast length of around 12.7m. That is about a foot lower than the Bm mast.

    Cheers, Arne

    PS:
    Something like this. If lowered to AR=2.0 the area is about 47sqm and the 40' mast can be used.

     

     


    Last modified: 07 Dec 2016 15:02 | Anonymous member (Administrator)
       " ...there is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing about in junk-rigged boats" 
                                                               - the Chinese Water Rat

                                                              Site contents © the Junk Rig Association and/or individual authors

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software