water bear 31

  • 30 Sep 2014 07:37
    Reply # 3111979 on 3007678
    Deleted user

    Hi all

    Thanks for your kind words. It is actually a great moment.

    I already sailed twice, and I will report more later in the week. For now, I will just say that I broke two hinges on two different battens (whether or not I am to blame for wrong rigging is still to be determined) and therefore close hauled sailing was kinda hard.

    Week's mission : find a way to fix the broken battens to take advantage of nice weather due next week end.


    Antoine

  • 28 Sep 2014 05:02
    Reply # 3110833 on 3007678
    Congratulations, Antoine.  I look forward to reading all about your adventures in the magazine.
  • 28 Sep 2014 00:36
    Reply # 3110778 on 3007678

    Congratulations Antoine, it's alway a great moment is it not. Get some photos once she's sailing and I cam put her on Boat of the Month.

    Last modified: 28 Sep 2014 00:37 | Anonymous member
  • 27 Sep 2014 11:25
    Reply # 3110610 on 3007678
    Deleted user

    SPLASH !


    WATER BEAR floats !


    Yesterday, a crane gently drop her in the water. Today, first try. I am quite happy.


    Oscar, I will write an article in next JRA mag issue.


    Antoine

  • 23 Sep 2014 15:21
    Reply # 3106422 on 3007678

    That's a really interesting hull, I'd love to see more pictures!

  • 19 Sep 2014 00:24
    Reply # 3102559 on 3102262
    Antoine ALLAIN wrote:

    Arne,

    I agree with you. I am already thinking to make a new sail, with increased surface.

    Whoo-hoo!  Fantastic!  I always thought the wee boat was not living up to her potential.  It will be great to hear how she goes with a big, Arne sail!
  • 18 Sep 2014 16:05
    Reply # 3102262 on 3007678
    Deleted user

    Arne,

    I agree with you. I am already thinking to make a new sail, with increased surface.

  • 30 Aug 2014 16:58
    Reply # 3089432 on 3007678
    Anonymous member (Administrator)

    I wrote to Paul Gartside in 1995 and asked if he would sell me a set of plans for Water Bear.  Unfortunately, Paul was not keen as he had found that the junkrig was not good and he seemed less than impressed by his own design as well. He would rather design a new boat for me with a conventional rig  -  and there our communication stopped. Even though I had told him about the new rig on my Malena, I guess he thought I was making it up (as most people seemed to do at the time). What a pity, I think the Water Bear design would  have been the ultimate fjord flyer with a decent size junkrig of around 30 – 35sqm sail area.

    Arne

     

  • 30 Aug 2014 09:19
    Reply # 3089315 on 3007678

    Even with her original, 248 sq ft Hasler rig (dead flat, wooden battens) Water Bear was extremely fast in moderate winds; with a professional Australian racing man crewing for me on his day off we outsailed a fully-crewed racing boat of around 37 feet from the Needles channel almost to Portsmouth before the wind fell light and they crept past us. Both reaching and running they couldn't catch us, despite three changes of spinnaker. My Wasp trailing log was off the scale for much of the time (max 10 knot). The boat had been laid up in Poole and had no kit on board apart from the old Seagull outboard in the forward cockpit locker; as on my original delivery trip with Paul Gartside from Malpas (Falmouth), WB would pick up a semi-plane on a wave and accelerate in a rush, slowing as the trough caught up with us, something I've never experienced in any other boat. She qualifies as a ULDB with only 4000lbs on a 28ft waterline, only suffering from excessive wetted area which shows up in the light wind performance. Paul has always thought she has excessive form stability, but the result is a remarkably controllable, solid feel combined with a lightness of touch and responsiveness that is really something special. I'm sure that some additional camber, combined with a small amount of extra canvas gained by extending the foot length would adequately address the light wind shortcomings. The rig does not need more luff length and the short mast has to be seen in the light of her shallow, lightly-ballasted keel and very low freeboard. Sadly, the design was not understood by Alan Burns, who made changes for Nick's OSTAR which were entirely contrary to the essence of the design, adding ugly, heavy, chunky steering gear and a ludicrous hull-pumping system which compromised both the watertight integrity and strength of the compartmentalized, triangulated hull design while adding weight and thus starting to defeat the simplicity of the design concept. To quote Colin Chapman 'Simplify then add lightness', a design philosophy that can be applied to boats as appropriately as to racing cars. When Nick talked about having 3 large anchors on board for the OSTAR (anchoring? in the Atlantic?) I knew the plot was being lost....

  • 29 Aug 2014 13:02
    Reply # 3088817 on 3007678
    Deleted user

    Thank you Mark

    A new rig is definitely a possible evolution of the boat. But as I havn't sailed her yet, you can understant I will wait a little. Beside, the current rigging and sail is quite in a god shape so there is no hurry.

    Anyway before doing anything, I will consult Arne and David, as they seem to be the go-to guys, when re-rigging a junk.

    Antoine


       " ...there is nothing - absolutely nothing - half so much worth doing as simply messing about in junk-rigged boats" 
                                                               - the Chinese Water Rat

                                                              Site contents © the Junk Rig Association and/or individual authors

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software